MedicalAICompetence.com

A new category of medical error has arrived — not from negligence, but from unfamiliarity.

Most clinicians now use AI. Few have been trained on how it fails. Medical AI Competence teaches the skills that close that gap — how large language models work, where they break, and how to use them safely for your patients.

A 10-second demonstration
One of these two citations was fabricated by an AI. Can you tell which?
The format is flawless either way — and that is exactly the problem. Fluency is not accuracy. A citation that looks perfect proves nothing, and fabricated references have already appeared in court filings, manuscripts, and clinical notes. Competency 4 of this course teaches you to verify any reference in under a minute.
Tap a citation to see the answer. No login, no tricks.
And it's all in the prompting

Fabrication isn't random. It's what a model does when you give it room to guess. The same model that invents a citation for a vague request will flag its own uncertainty when you ask it to. The fix isn't a better model — it's a better prompt.

A weak prompt

"How do I treat preeclampsia at 28 weeks?"

Open-ended, no context, no rules. The model fills the gaps with whatever sounds right — including confident detail it cannot support.

A Clinical Evidence Prompt (CEP)

"I'm caring for a patient with preeclampsia at 28 weeks of gestation. What are the evidence-based options for managing her, and what factors decide between expectant management and delivery? Use the Clinical Evidence Prompt (CEP): answer with reliable clinical evidence, identify missing clinical information, separate evidence from inference, state certainty, cite factual claims, and say clearly when evidence is limited or you do not know."

Adds it to any clinical question. It forces the model to mark what is evidence, what is inference, and where it isn't sure — the difference between a guess and an answer you can check.

Get the prompt guides →

Ready-made, copy-and-paste prompts that do exactly this: force the model to mark evidence, flag its uncertainty, and hand you real numbers. Free to save and share.

The course

Sixty minutes that change how you use AI.

Ten modules, a 10-question assessed examination, and a certificate of completion at 70% or above. Designed for physicians, residents, nurses, midwives, and advanced practice providers. No technical background assumed. Free.

Start the course See the competencies

Already know the basics? Go deeper with the full practicum →

10
Modules
~60
Minutes
70%
Passing score
🎓
Certificate
The course family

One standard, four courses

Start with the foundation, go deep with the practicum, learn to build your own tools, and point your patients to the plain-language companion. Same evidence standards across all four.

Why competence, not just access

The tool is in every clinic. The training isn't.

AI is already writing notes, answering patient questions, and suggesting differentials. Most clinicians treat it like a search box — type a question, accept the answer. Competent use rests on two skills, in this order:

Skill 1 — Where most of the work is

Asking the right question, with the right context

The quality of an AI answer is set before the model writes a word — by how you define the clinical question and engineer the context: the patient's situation, the decision point, the constraints, what you already know, and what you need back. This is the core craft of clinical AI use, and it occupies most of the curriculum: defining the question, choosing the right tool, framing context, and building stepwise workflows.

Skill 2 — Where the danger is

Recognizing how AI fails

Even a well-framed question can return an answer that is confident, fluent, and wrong. The three failure modes that do most of the damage: fabrication — citations, doses, and studies that don't exist, formatted exactly like ones that do (you just saw it above); sycophancy — present a wrong premise with confidence and the model validates it; and stale confidence — a guideline replaced last year, summarized with today's certainty.

If the pace of AI feels impossible to keep up with, that's because it is. No clinician can track every model release, and none needs to. Feeling behind is nearly universal — including among the people who teach this. Competence is not consumption. It is a small, durable set of skills — framing the question, supplying the context, verifying the output — that holds steady while the models change underneath it. That is what this course teaches.

The framework

The 10 clinical AI competencies

A sequenced curriculum — from how the technology actually works, through verification and failure recognition, to ethics, governance, and the standard of care. Each module is free, takes a few minutes, and ends in a real assessment.

New: the AI terms glossary. 110 plain-language definitions of the AI vocabulary clinicians keep tripping over: from hallucination and PHI to agentic testing, plus the features unique to Claude and ChatGPT. The companion reference to the course. Open the glossary →

Who's behind this

Fifty years inside the system — with the receipts.

ObGyn Intelligence

Amos Grünebaum, MD, is Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Maternal-Fetal Medicine at the Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell and Senior Ethics Consultant at Northwell Health. In more than fifty years of clinical practice he has delivered over 10,000 babies and published more than 175 peer-reviewed papers.

He was writing about large language models in clinical medicine before most of medicine had tried one — and he has spent the time since building tools, courses, and frameworks that turn AI enthusiasm into AI competence. He publishes ObGyn Intelligence at obmd.com and maintains a free suite of evidence-based clinical tools at tools.obmd.com.

✓ Verified — the receipt

Grünebaum A, Chervenak J, Pollet SL, Katz A, Chervenak FA. The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):696-705. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.009. PMID 36924907. Published online March 14, 2023.